Tag Archives: funding

Assessing Outcomes

The IOM, P2P and AHRQ reports all pointed out a serious gap in ME/CFS research: the absence of validated ways of assessing clinical outcomes. I have new information about an initiative to change that, and I’ll be speaking about my … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 20 Comments

This Week in Virology Covers ME/CFS

You may remember This Week in Virology (TWiV) from their XMRV coverage several years ago. I’ve remained an avid listener of the show, simply because it is such a great ongoing conversation about science. And TWiV has continued its coverage … Continue reading

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 23 Comments

Expired Opportunities

NIH funding of ME/CFS research has bumped up against a deadline that could have dire consequences for 2015 and beyond. The primary mechanism for grant applications has expired. Grant applications to NIH must be submitted in response to calls for … Continue reading

Posted in Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

2014 NIH Spending on ME/CFS Studies

There is no denying or avoiding the importance of the IOM report and its associated controversies, but ME/CFS advocates must keep eyes on the prize: NIH funding for ME/CFS research. The 2014 spending numbers are out and NIH did not … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 30 Comments

Your Move, HHS

Since the IOM report came out, the patient/advocate online community has been on fire. Everyone is staking out a position. You like the name, or you don’t; you think the definition will work, or it won’t. And I have plenty … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 35 Comments

IOM: Report Card

It’s here. A new case definition and a new name. It will take some time for me to get through the 300 page report and prepare a more detailed analysis. But based on the press conference and summary, how did … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 61 Comments

CFSAC Meets P2P

Mary Dimmock has been kind enough to provide this post and transcript of the CFS Advisory Committee’s discussion of the P2P report this week. Since the Executive Summary for the P2P ME/CFS Workshop was published on December 18, 2014, a … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

P2P Report: First Read

The P2P Panel’s draft report on advancing ME/CFS research has been published. The report is not the nightmare that many people feared, but it is also not what I had hoped for or what we need. The advocacy chatter I’ve … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 38 Comments

NIH: Passing ME/CFS Over Again

NIH will (in its own mind anyway) be showcasing ME/CFS at the P2P Workshop next week. But ME/CFS research at NIH is caught in a never-ending cycle of being passed over in every way that matters. At its June 2014 … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

P2P: Not This Science

The P2P Workshop agenda focuses on a few broad categories of ME/CFS research: characteristics of the ME/CFS population; fostering innovative research; presentation and diagnosis in clinic; and, tools and measures for diagnosis and outcomes. Yet even with the late addition … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments